Usha Rani v. State Of Haryana And Others
1-
!
"#$$ USHA RANI Petitioner
VERSUS
STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS Respondents %# & '%$
(%
(( $ )))
Present:
Mr. Jasbir Mor, Advocate for petitioner.
**** %
(( * $ Present Civil Writ Petition has been filed under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India for quashing impugned order dated 22.09.2020 (P56) passed by respondent No.2 to the extent of including the name of the petitioner in the list of compulsory transfers and also compelling him to fill up the choices for participating in online transfer drive 2020 in view of transfer policy of the Government dated 13.02.2020 and 06.03.2020 (P51 and P52); for quashing clause 8 of the on5line transfer policy dated 27.08.2020 (P54); and also to stay the operation of the impugned letter/order dated 22.09.2020 (P56). At the outset, instead of pressing the petition on merits, learned counsel for petitioner submits that he would be satisfied in case the representation dated 24.09.2020 (P58) submitted by petitioner is decided by the competent authority on some early date. Prayer seems to be justified.
Notice of motion.
2Mr. P.P. Chahar, D.A.G., Haryana accepts notice on behalf of respondents. Learned State counsel is not averse to the innocuous prayer made by petitioner.
In view of the agreed stand taken by both sides, but without going into the merits of the case; this Court deems it appropriate to dispose off the present writ petition with direction to respondent No.2 to consider and decide the representation dated 24.09.2020 (P58), if the same is pending, by passing a speaking order in accordance with law, expeditiously, but not later than two weeks from today. Ordered accordingly.
Needless to say that if some adverse decision is taken against petitioner, he would be at liberty to take recourse to the remedy available under law. + ,- .* /%
((
Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No RAJENDER KUMAR 2020.11.09 16:01 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document