Teena Yadav v. State Of Haryana And ORS.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT
CHANDIGARH CWP No. 26514 of 2015 Date of Decision:- 03.03.2016 Teena Yadav ....Petitioner
Versus
State of Haryana and others ....Respondents
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE RITU BAHRI
Present:
None for the petitioner.
Mr. Keshav Gupta, Assistant Advocate General, Haryana. **** RITU BAHRI, J. (Oral) At the very outset, learned State counsel submits that since the impugned order under challenge has since been withdrawn by the respondent authorities, so, the present writ petition has become infructuous. In view of above fact, the present writ petition is disposed of as having become infructuous.
March 01, 2016 ( RITU BAHRI ) naresh.k JUDGE NARESH KUMAR 2016.03.05 10:31 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh