← Library
High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCRM-M/41621/2021disposed of

Anubhav Singh v. State Of Haryana And Others

2021-10-05Mr. Justice Rajesh Bhardwaj2 pages

CRM-M-41621-2021 (O&M) -1IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-41621-2021 (O&M) Date of Decision:October 05, 2021 Anubhav Singla .....Petitioner

Versus

State of Haryana and others ......Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAJESH BHARDWAJ

Present:

Mr.Aman Bansal,Advocate for the petitioner.

........

RAJESH BHARDWAJ, J. (ORAL) Learned counsel for the petitioner has approached this Court by way of filing this petition with a prayer that action be taken against guilty police officials of Women Cell, MDC, Panchkula, who acted in connivance with respondent No.7 and replaced the original complaint No.16 Dasti/28.01.2017 (Annexure P-3) from police custody with forged and manipulated Complaint (Annexure P-1).

It is contended that though the petitioner already stands acquitted in FIR No.42, dated 22.09.2017, under Sections 323/406/498A/506/34 IPC, registered at Women Police Station, Panchkula, lodged by the wife, however, now after his acquittal he has come to know that the original complaint filed by the wife was dated 28.01.2017, annexed as Annexure P-3, but some police officials in connivance with the complainant replaced the same with the complaint as Annexure P-1. He submits as the action of the police officials is totally mala fide, so he filed the representation Annexure P-4, but no action has been taken on the same till date.

MEENU 2021.10.07 16:54 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document chandigarh

CRM-M-41621-2021 (O&M) -2Issue notice of motion.

On the asking of the Court, Mr.B.S.Virk, Deputy Advocate General, Haryana, accepts notice on behalf of the official respondents. Heard.

In view of the overall facts and circumstances of the case, the present petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No.3, i.e. the Commissioner of Police, Panchkula, District Panchkula, Haryana, to look into the representation, if any filed by the petitioner before him and decide the same expeditiously in accordance with law and preferably within one month.

October 05, 2021 ( RAJESH BHARDWAJ ) meenuss JUDGE 1.

Whether speaking/reasoned ?

Yes/No 2.

Whether reportable ?

Yes/No MEENU 2021.10.07 16:54 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document chandigarh