Mahender Singh v. Kaushal

CRM-A-2506-2019 (O&M) MAHENDER SINGH V/S KAUSHAL

Present:

Mr. Amit Choudhary, Advocate for the applicant.

Mr. ShakƟ Mehta, Advocate for the respondent.

*** CRM-34117-2019 For the reasons menƟoned in the applicaƟon, delay of 96 days in filing the appeal is condoned.

ApplicaƟon stands disposed of.

CRM-34115-2019 To be heard at the Ɵme of final hearing.

CRM-A-2506-2019 Applicant's counsel submits that the present applicaƟon was filed against acquiƩal in the year 2019 and he has a very good case on merit. Counsel appearing for the respondent submits that the judgment of acquiƩal is well reasoned and leave to appeal should not be granted. He further submits that in case, this Court grants leave to appeal and admit the main appeal, its turn will not come for hearing for decades, as such pendency of the appeal may be treated in-consequenƟal for the respondent.

Leave to appeal granted.

Counsel for the respondent submits that he be exempted from furnishing bail bonds/surety bonds before the concerned trial Court or Chief Judicial Magistrate. He undertakes to surrender before the majesty of Court as and when this Court directed to do so or in case of reversal of the judgment.

Given such undertaking, there shall be no need to furnish bail bonds/surety bonds by the respondent.

Main appeal Admit.

List for final hearing on its own turn as per its queue. It is clarified that pendency of this appeal shall be in-consequenƟal for any purpose against the respondent-accused.

(ANOOP CHITKARA) JUDGE 18.09.2024 JyoƟ Sharma Jyoti Sharma 2024.09.19 10:10 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment High Court, Sector 1, Chandigarh