Vakil Raj @ Raja v. State Of Haryana
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT
CHANDIGARH CRM-M-10167-2021 (O&M) Date of Decision : 15.03.2022 VAKIL RAJ @ RAJA
...Petitioner
VERSUS
STATE OF HARYANA
...Respondent
CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANOOP CHITKARA
Present:
Mr. Sanjiv Gupta, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Rajat Gautam, DAG, Haryana.
(Through Video Conferencing) **** ANOOP CHITKARA, J (ORAL) After arguing for some time, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he may be permitted withdraw the present petition with liberty to file afresh representation before the appropriate authority and directions may be issued to competent authority to decide the said representation within a time bound manner.
Prayer is innocuous. Learned State counsel has no objection to the prayer.
Given above, the present petition is disposed of as having been withdrawn.
Needless to say that the said representation be filed before the Superintendent of Jail, Jind. In case such representation filed, the same should be decided by Superintendent of Police, Jind, within 10 days from today in accordance with law.
Petitioner is at liberty to file fresh petition, if need arise. (ANOOP CHITKARA) JUDGE March 15, 2022 Riya Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes Whether reportable : No.
RIYA 2022.03.16 10:23 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document left bottom