Rinku v. State Of Haryana

2023:PHHC:139718

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH CRM-M No.35942 of 2023 Date of Decision: 02.11.2023 Rinku .....Petitioner.

Versus

State of Haryana .....Respondent.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MEENAKSHI I. MEHTA ***** Present:- Mr. Rahul Deswal, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. Amrik Singh Narwal, AAG, Haryana for the respondent-State.

MEENAKSHI I. MEHTA, J.(Oral) By way of the instant petition, the petitioner has sought the relief of anticipatory/pre-arrest bail in the criminal case arisen out of the FIR bearing No.64 dated 22.06.2023 registered at Women Police Station, Assandh, District Karnal, under Sections 354-A, 452 & 506 IPC, wherein the offences under Section 342 IPC and Section 8 of the POCSO Act are stated to have been added and the offence under Section 452 IPC is reported to have been deleted, later-on.

2.

Today, learned State counsel, on the instructions from ASI Parveen Lata from the afore-referred Police Station, informs the Court that in compliance of the order passed by this Court on 27.07.2023, the YAG DUTT 2023.11.03 16.03 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgement

CRM-M No.35942 of 2023 -22023:PHHC:139718 petitioner has joined the investigation and his custodial interrogation is not required and he is also not involved in any other criminal case. 3.

In view of the above-discussed submission as made by learned State counsel, the present petition is allowed and the relief of interim bail, as extended to the petitioner named Rinku by this Court vide the said order dated 27.07.2023, is hereby made absolute.

4.

However, the petitioner shall continue to join the investigation as and when required/called upon to do so and shall also strictly abide by all the conditions as laid down in Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. (MEENAKSHI I. MEHTA) November 02, 2023 JUDGE Yag Dutt Whether speaking/reasoned:

Yes Whether Reportable:

No YAG DUTT 2023.11.03 16.03 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgement