← Library
High Court of Punjab and HaryanaFAO/4279/2011allowed

Raj @ Rajo & ORS. v. Hariya & ORS.

2018-01-08Mr. Justice Arun Monga2 pages

FAO-4279-2011

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH FAO-4279-2011 Date of decision : 08.01.2018 Smt. Raj @ Rajo and others ... Appellant(s)

Versus

Hariya and others ... Respondent(s)

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT RAWAL

Present:

Mr. Anshuman Dalal, Advocate for the appellants.

Mr. Pardeep Goyal, Advocate for Mr. Abhishek Goyal, Advocate for respondent No.3/Insurance Company.

**** AMIT RAWAL, J. (ORAL) The appeal has been preferred by the Legal Representatives of Amarjeet, who died in a motor accident occurred on 21.05.2010, for enhancement of compensation against the Award passed by the Tribunal, whereby a compensation of `11,08,000/- along with interest @ 7.5% per annum, had been awarded.

Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the appellantsclaimants submits that the Tribunal has awarded the compensation to the tune of ` 11,08,000/-, which is on lower side. Multiplier of '17' should have been applied instead of '16'. Moreover, no increase was made in the salary towards future prospects and the amount of `20,000/- towards loss of consortium and ` 20,000/- for funeral expenses are also too meagre, thus, there is scope for enhancement.

On the other hand, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Insurance Company submits that the Tribunal has taken care of all the heads Yogesh Sharma 2018.01.12 09:46 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

FAO-4279-2011 sufficiently and there is no scope for further enhancement, thus, urges this Court for dismissal of the appeal.

I have heard the learned counsel for the parties and appraised the paper book and of the view that the compensation to the tune of `11,08,000/- is on lower side and accordingly, I take the income of the deceased as `7,425/- per month as taken by the Tribunal and provide 40% future prospects and apply a multiplier of '17' instead of '16' and deduction of 1/4th to assess the loss of dependency as `15,90,588/-. I will further add to it `70,000/- towards conventional heads i.e. loss of consortium, loss of estate and funeral expenses as per the latest judgment dated 31.10.2017 rendered by Hon'ble the Supreme Court in SLP (Civil) No.25590 of 2014 titled as "National Insurance Company Ltd. V/s Pranay Sethi and others".

In all the compensation payable shall be `16,60,588/-. The amount in excess over what has already been provided by the Tribunal shall also attract interest @ 6% per annum from the date of filing of the appeal till its realization. The liability shall remain the same as has already been determined by the Tribunal.

The award passed by the Tribunal is modified to the above extent and the appeal stands allowed.

( AMIT RAWAL) JUDGE 08.01.2018 Yogesh Sharma  Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/ No  Whether Reportable Yes/ No Yogesh Sharma 2018.01.12 09:46 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document