Ritesh v. State Of Haryana And ANR.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH CWP No. 22092 of 2017 Date of decision: 27.09.2017 Dr. Ritesh ....Petitioner(s)

Versus

State of Haryana and another

...Respondent(s)

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SANDHAWALIA

Present:

Mr. R.K. Malik, Sr. Advocate, with Mr. Bhupinder Malik, Advocate, for the petitioner.

G.S.SANDHAWALIA, J. (Oral) Challenge in the present writ petition is to the cancellation of transfer order dated 05.09.2017 (Annexure P-4) from the Specialized Centre/Therapy Special Centre, Jind.

Senior counsel for the petitioner submits that as per the policy, only a M.D./Post Graduate Doctor is to be posted at the specialized centre and, therefore, the petitioner had been posted. As noticed, the said order now stands cancelled vide impugned order dated 05.09.2017 (Annexure P-4). It is settled principle that this Court is not to interfere in transfer matters until they are mala fide. Even otherwise, it is always open to the petitioner to point out the policy which has now been relied upon to the competent authorities for the redressal of his grievances. Nothing has been placed on record to show to this Court that the petitioner has approached the authorities for the redressal of his grievances.

In such circumstances, this Court is of the opinion that the discretionary relief under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is not liable to be granted.

Accordingly, the present writ petition is dismissed in limine. 27.09.2017 (G.S. SANDHAWALIA) shivani JUDGE Whether reasoned/speaking Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No Shivani Gupta 2017.10.31 16:05 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

Shivani Gupta 2017.10.31 16:05 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document