Tarsem Lal v. State Of Punjab And ORS.

CWP No.26694 of 2015 [1]

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No. 26694 of 2015 Date of Decision: December 21 , 2015.

Tarsem Lal ...... PETITIONER (s)

Versus

State of Punjab and others ...... RESPONDENT (s) CORAM:- HON'BLE MRS.JUSTICE LISA GILL

Present:

Mr. Inderjit Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner.

*****

1. Whether reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?

2. To be referred to the reporters or not?

3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the digest? ***** LISA GILL, J.

It is submitted that petitioner has prayed for extension in service after he attains the age of superannuation on 31.12.2015 in terms of notifications dated 27.02.2013 (Annexure P1) and dated 30.10.2015 (Annexure P2). Respondent No.4 has granted extension to other employees, one of them being Smt. Naresh Sharma, Junior Assistant as reflected in communication dated 17.06.2013, Annexure P5. There is no impediment in granting extension in service to the petitioner. At this stage, it is prayed that respondents be directed to decide petitioner's representation dated 05.11.2015 Annexure P4 in a time bound manner.

OMKAR SINGH 2015.12.22 13:51 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh

CWP No.26694 of 2015 [2] Keeping in view the limited prayer addressed, facts and circumstances of the case but without expressing any opinion on the merits of the controversy or eligibility of the petitioner for extension in service, this writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the competent authority to expeditiously decide representation dated 05.11.2015 Annexure P4, by passing a speaking order, preferably within a period of one month from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order.

( LISA GILL ) December 21 , 2015.

JUDGE 'om'

OMKAR SINGH 2015.12.22 13:51 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh