Hawa Singh v. State Of Haryana
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH DATE OF DECISION :- 16.06.2025 Hawa Singh
...Petitioner
Versus
State of Haryana
...Respondent
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KSHETARPAL Present:- Mr. S.S. Sahu, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Sharan Sethi, Addl. A.G., Haryana.
*** ANIL KSHETARPAL , J.
(ORAL) 1.
Petitioner prays for grant of concession of bail in FIR No. 18 dated 21.01.2025 under Sections 108, 115(2), 3(5), 127 (2), 103(1)/61 of BNS, 2023 (however, Sections 103(1)/61 of BNS were deleted later on), registered at Police Station Sector 5, Gurgaon, District Gurgaon. 2.
The facts of the prosecution's case have been noticed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Gurugram in the following manner:- "The brief facts of the prosecution case are that the present case has been registered on the complaint of complainant Krishan Kumar wherein it is mentioned that he has two sons, the elder son Navdeep aged about 35 years old lives in house no. 32. His younger son Amit is about 32 years old. Navdeep built his own house in Ashok Vihar, Gurugram and lived with his wife Seema and daughter Naisa and worked in a private company as a software engineer. He was married to Seema, the daughter of Ramkumar, resident of Kutiyawali, police station Adampur, District Hisar. He has a daughter, Naisa. It has been 3 years since his marriage, Navdeep lived with his wife Seema and
three daughters Naisa in Gurugram and now he was living in his own house for about a year. There was a dispute between my son Navdeep and Seema, due to which Seema used to call her parents' home and inform her father, brothers and family members. She used to call him and after quarreling with Navdeep, she used to take Seema with her and she used to return back. This has been going on for a long time. Today he spoke to Navdeep on the phone. He only told him about his happiness. When he called him at around 4:48 PM in the evening, Navdeep did not pick up his call. Then he called his nephew Ajay who lives in Gurugram. He asked him to go to Navdeep and make him talk to him. When Ajay came to Navdeep's house and told him that Navdeep was lying dead in his room and his neck was tied to the bed sheet.
He informed SEC-5 police station Gurugram about this and left for Gurugram for Navdeep's house with his family. On reaching Navdeep's house, he saw that Navdeep was lying dead on the floor in the room and a knot was tied around his neck with the bed sheet. There was dry blood on his face and blood was coming out of his nose which is now dry and there were injury marks on his hands as well. When he inquired about this in hborhood, he came to know that Navdeep's wife Seema, Seema's am Kumar and Seema's brother had come in an Alto car and at 1:30-4 PM, they were seen coming from Navdeep's house in a is daughter-in-law Seema alongwith her father and her brothers agled his son Navdeep to death. Legal action should be taken A nose who have committed murder by beating."
3.
Learned counsel representing the petitioner submits that the petitioner is brother of father-in-law of deceased Navdeep and no specific role has been attributed to the petitioner. Navdeep committed suicide and the entire family of the wife has been falsely implicated.
4.
Learned State counsel has admitted that on completion of investigation final report has been submitted and the case is now fixed for hearing arguments on charge.
5.
As per custody certificate, the petitioner has already suffered incarceration for a period of 04 months 20 days. He is a first time offender. 6.
Without commenting upon the merits of the case and keeping in view the aforesaid facts, it is considered appropriate to release the petitioner on regular bail on her furnishing bail bonds/surety bonds to the satisfaction of the concerned trial court/Duty Magistrate/Chief Judicial Magistrate. 7.
The petition stands allowed.
8.
All the pending miscellaneous applications, if any, are also disposed of.
(ANIL KSHETARPAL ) JUDGE 16.06.2025 P.Singh Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No