Roshan Lal v. State Of Haryana And ANR

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH CWP No. 20523 of 2018 DATE OF DECISION : 27.04.2022 Roshan Lal

...Petitioner

versus State of Haryana and another

...Respondents

CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN MONGA Present :

Mr. Johan Kumar, Advocate, for the petitioner.

Mr. Saurabh Mohunta, DAG, Haryana.

ARUN MONGA, J. (ORAL) Petitioner herein seeks issuance of writ in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents to reinstate the petitioner on the post of Patwari with effect from the date of his suspension i.e., 10.03.2016 and re-fix his pay along with consequential benefits including full pay and allowances.

2.

Learned counsel for the petitioner at the outset submits that during pendency of the present petition relief sought by the petitioner has been granted to him on administrative side. He further contends that but interest and other allowances are also payable to the petitioner. 3.

Learned counsel further contends that liberty be granted to the petitioner to make representation to the department qua the interest and other allowances which have not been paid to him. May do so. 4.

The instant writ petition is disposed of with an expectation that the respondent shall look into the representation, if any, made by the petitioner and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law. APRIL 27, 2022 (ARUN MONGA) Shalini JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned :

Yes/No Whether reportable :

Yes/No SHALINI BHATIA 2022.04.29 17:51 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document.