Shivani v. Union Of India And ORS.

CWP-16089-2023 -12023:PHHC:096528

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH CWP-16089-2023 Date of Decision : 28.07.2023 Shivani ......... Petitioner

Versus

Union of India and others ......... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGMOHAN BANSAL Present :

Ms.Kashish Garg, Advocate for the petitioner.

Ms. Puneeta Sethi, Advocate for respondent No.1.

Mr. Rajesh Gupta, Advocate for respondents No.2 to 6.

**** JAGMOHAN BANSAL , J. (Oral) The petitioner through instant petition under Articles 226/227 of Constitution of India is seeking directions to the respondents to expeditiously consider and decide his application seeking compassionate appointment.

Ms. Puneeta Sethi, Advocate for respondent No.1 and Mr. Rajesh Gupta, Advocate for respondents No.2 to 6, who on advance notice are present in Court, submit that the petitioner has remedy to approach Central Administrative Tribunal (for short, 'CAT'), thus, the petitioner deserves to be relegated to CAT.

On being confronted with aforesaid fact, Ms.Kashish Garg, Advocate seeks permission to withdraw the present petition with liberty to ANJU GOEL 2023.07.28 17:49 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

CWP-16089-2023 -22023:PHHC:096528 approach CAT.

Dismissed as withdrawn with aforesaid liberty. It is made clear that if it is found that CAT has no jurisdiction, the petitioner would be at liberty to move an appropriate application. ( JAGMOHAN BANSAL ) 28.07.2023 JUDGE anju Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No ANJU GOEL 2023.07.28 17:49 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document