Rehbar Ayurvedic And Unani Tibbi Medical College, v. Union Of India And Others

CWP-22295-2017 -1HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-22295-2017 Date of Decision: October 25, 2017 Rehbar Ayurvedic and Unani Tibbi Medical College, Hospital and Research Centre .....Petitioner

Versus

Union of India and others ......Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR MITTAL 1.

To be referred to the Reporters or not?

Yes/No 2.

Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Yes/No.

3.

Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? Yes/No .......

Present:

Mr.G.S.Attariwala, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr.Puneet Gupta, Sr.Panel Counsel, Union of India and Mr.Anil Chawla, Advocate for respondent No.1. Mr.Sunil Kumar Sharma, Advocate for respondent No.2-CCIM Mr.T.S.Chauhan & Mr.Satnam Chauhan, Advocates for the respondent-University.

........

SURYA KANT, J.

The petitioner is an unaided self financed Ayurvedic and Unani Tibbi Medical College. It has approached this Court seeking a direction that instead of 50 seats in 'Under Graduate (BUMS) Course', it may be permitted to make admissions against 60 seats, namely 10 additional seats. [2] Vide interim order dated September 28, 2017, the petitionerCollege was permitted to apply for the increase of its intake capacity in terms of the order dated 18.09.2017 passed by this Court in LPA No.1298 of 2017. The petitioner was directed to submit such application by 03.10.2017. Meenu 2017.11.01 15:43 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document chandigarh [3] Learned counsel for Union of India on instructions states that

CWP-22295-2017 -2the petitioner did not avail the benefit of above order and has not applied for the increase of its intake capacity. Be that as it may, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to Union of India and CCIM that in case the petitioner-College has applied for increase of its intake capacity, its application be decided on merits in accordance with the Regulations alongwith the claim of other similarly placed colleges. However, if the petitioner-College has chosen not to apply for increase of its intake capacity, then the matter may be treated to have become infructuous. ( SURYA KANT ) JUDGE October 25, 2017 ( SUDHIR MITTAL ) meenuss JUDGE 1.

Whether speaking/reasoned ?

Yes/No 2.

Whether reportable ?

Yes/No Meenu 2017.11.01 15:43 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document chandigarh