Lacho v. State Of Punjab And ORS.

CWP No.26838 of 2015 [1]

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No. 26838 of 2015 Date of Decision: December 22 , 2015.

Lacho ...... PETITIONER (s)

Versus

State of Punjab and others ...... RESPONDENT (s) CORAM:- HON'BLE MRS.JUSTICE LISA GILL

Present:

Mr. MJS Bedi, Advocate for the petitioner.

*****

1. Whether reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?

2. To be referred to the reporters or not?

3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the digest? ***** LISA GILL, J.

It is submitted that complete retiral benefits due to the petitioner are not being released despite petitioner having retired in the month of August, 2014. There is no impediment in the release of the same. Legal notice dated 07.10.2015, Annexure P2 has been served upon the respondents however, no action has been taken thereon. At this stage, it is prayed that respondents be directed to decide legal notice 07.10.2015, served upon them by the petitioner in a time bound manner.

Keeping in view the limited prayer, facts and circumstances of the case but without expressing any opinion on the merits of the controversy, this OMKAR SINGH 2015.12.29 11:42 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh

CWP No.26838 of 2015 [2] writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the competent authority to expeditiously decide legal notice dated 07.10.2015 Annexure P2, by passing a speaking order, preferably within a period of four months from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order. In case, any benefit is found due towards the petitioner, same be released within a period of six weeks thereafter. ( LISA GILL ) December 22 , 2015.

JUDGE 'om'

OMKAR SINGH 2015.12.29 11:42 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh