Sterling Enterprises v. Union Of India And ORS

...1...

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH Sr.No.111 Date of decision: 09.11.2020 Sterling Enterprises through its proprietor Sh.Man Mohan

...Petitioner

Versus

Union of India & Ors.

...Respondents

(Heard through Video-Conferencing)

CORAM:

HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE DAYA CHAUDHARY HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MEENAKSHI I. MEHTA

Present:

Mr. Chetan Jain, Advocate for the petitioner.

Ms.Ridhi Bansal, Advocate, for Mr.Sunish Bindlish, Advocate, for respondent No.1-Union of India.

Ms.Anupal, DAG, Punjab, for respondents No.2 & 3.

* * * Daya Chaudhary, J. (Oral) Notice of motion.

At the asking of the Court, Ms.Ridhi Bansal, Advocate, while appearing for Mr. Sunish Bindlish, Advocate, accepts notice on behalf of respondent No.1-Union of India and Ms.Anu Pal, DAG, Punjab, accepts notice on behalf of respondents No.2 and 3.

Learned State counsel submits that the petitioner has not challenged the order dated 30.10.2020 which is appealable and the remedy of appeal has not been availed.

...2...

Learned counsel for the petitioner prays that he may be permitted to withdraw the present petition with liberty to file appeal. Dismissed as withdrawn with the liberty afore-said. (DAYA CHAUDHARY) JUDGE 09.11.2020.

(MEENAKSHI I. MEHTA) seema JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned? Yes/No Whether Reportable?

Yes/No

...3...