Vaisakhi Ram v. State Of Haryana

CRM-M No. 36568 of 2020 -1In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh CRM-M No. 36568 of 2020 Date of Decision: 09.11.2020 Vaisakhi Ram ......Petitioner

Versus

State of Haryana ......Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARNARESH SINGH GILL

Present:

Mr. P.S.Mehrok, Advocate for the petitioner.

**** HARNARESH SINGH GILL , J. (ORAL) Case is being taken up for hearing through video conferencing. Through the instant petition, the petitioner seeks anticipatory bail in case FIR No. 251 dated 30.9.2020, registered under Sections 171/392/394/397 IPC, Police Station Cheeka, District Kaithal. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is 70% handicapped from the lower limb and the allegations against the petitioner are totally wrong.

Notice of motion.

On the asking of the Court, Mr. R.K.Ambavta, AAG, Haryana accepts notice on behalf of the State. He has pointed out that the petitioner is also involved in four other cases.

I have heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned State counsel.

In the present case, the petitioner and the co-accused have GURPREET SINGH 2020.11.09 17:12 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chadigarh committed robbery on the gun point wearing police uniform. Not only this,

CRM-M No. 36568 of 2020 -2they have also looted cash and the recovery from the petitioner is yet to be effected. Moreover, the petitioner has also been involved in four other cases. The allegations against the petitioner are serious in nature. No ground for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner is made out. The petition is dismissed.

(HARNARESH SINGH GILL) JUDGE November 09, 2020 Gurpreet Whether speaking/reasoned :

Yes/No Whether reportable :

Yes/No GURPREET SINGH 2020.11.09 17:12 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chadigarh