High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCWP/26953/2015disposed of

Lok Bhalai Insaf Welfare Society (Regd.) v. State Of Punjab And ORS

2016-12-08Mr. Justice Surinder Gupta,Mrs Justice Daya Chaudhary2 pages

-1CWP No.26953 of 2015

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH CWP No.26953 of 2015 Date of decision: 08.12.2016 Lok Bhalai Insaf Welfare Society (Regd.) ....Petitioner

Versus

State of Punjab and others ....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR MITTAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAMENDRA JAIN Present: - Mr. Ish Puneet Singh, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Rajinder Goyal, Addl. A.G., Punjab.

Ms. P.K. Sekhon, Advocate, for respondent No.8. Mr. Gurminder Singh, Sr. Advocate, with Mr. R.P.S. Bara, Advocate.

Mr. Salil Sablok, Advocate for the applicants in CM No.5826 of 2016.

***** AJAY KUMAR MITTAL, J. (ORAL) Prayer in this writ petition filed in the nature of Public Interest Litigation under Articles 226/227 is for issuance of a writ in the nature of certiorari for quashing the impugned order dated 17.11.2015 (Annexure P5) passed by respondent No.2 and also for issuance of a writ in the nature of mandamus for directions to the respondents to enquire into the mismanagement of panchayat lands as the same are being misused for the illegal benefit of respondent No.8.

Ravinder Singh 2016.12.13 10:37 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document 2.

Learned State counsel has produced Punjabi version along with

-2CWP No.26953 of 2015 true translation of order dated 08.11.2016 issued by the Secretary, Punjab Government, Rural Development & Panchayat Department vide which the sanction dated 17.11.2015 given by the Financial Commissioner, Rural Development & Panchayat Department for sale of 79 acre 5 kanal 10 marlas of land has been withdrawn. Copy of the Punjabi version of the aforesaid order along with its true translation is taken on record. 3.

In view of above, present writ petition has been rendered infructuous and the same is disposed of as such. 4.

In view of the disposal of main petition as infructuous, no further orders are required to be passed on civil miscellaneous applications and the same are also disposed of as such.

(AJAY KUMAR MITTAL) JUDGE (RAMENDRA JAIN) 08.12.2016 JUDGE R.S.

Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No Ravinder Singh 2016.12.13 10:37 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document