Hirday Ram v. Union Of India And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

Civil Writ Petition No.26016 of 2016.

Date of Decision: December 16, 2016 Hirdey Ram ......Petitioner versus Union of India and others .....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT.

HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SUDIP AHLUWALIA.

*** Present: Mr.Vikram Singh, Advocate, for the petitioner. -.-

1. Whether Reporters of Local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?

2. To be referred to the Reporters or not?

3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? --- Surya Kant, J . (Oral) Petitioner's application for the release of his land abutting National Highway No.8 appears to be under consideration of the Competent Authority-cum-Land Acquisition Collector-cum-Sub Divisional Magistrate, Gurgaon (North). It is claimed that favourable recommendations have already been made by the Project Director, National Highway Authority of India vide memo dated 11.05.2016.

There is no legal issue involved in this writ petition which may calls for adjudication by this Court. We thus dispose of the same without expressing any views on the merits of petitioner's claim, with liberty to him to pursue the matter before the Competent Authority who shall surely take some decision on the recommendations said to have been made by the Project Director, National Highway Authority of India. The writ petition stands disposed of accordingly. [SURYA KANT] JUDGE December 16, 2016 [SUDIP AHLUWALIA] mohinder JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned :

Yes/No Whether Reportable :

Yes/No Mohinder Kumar Kamboj 2016.12.22 15:15 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh