Raksha Devi v. Union Bank Of India

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

CWP-26061-2016 Date of decision: 16.12.2016 Raksha Devi ..... Petitioner

Versus

Union Bank of India ..... Respondent

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR MITTAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAMENDRA JAIN PRESENT: Mr. Tribhuwan Singla, Advocate for the petitioner. AJAY KUMAR MITTAL, J. (ORAL) 1.

The petitioner has approached this Court under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India inter alia seeking quashing of orders dated 19.09.2013 and 24.09.2013 (Annexures P-3 and P-4, respectively) passed by the Debts Recovery Tribunal-II, Chandigarh. 2.

After arguing for sometime, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that he may be allowed to withdraw the present petition, with liberty to the petitioner to take recourse to the alternative remedies, as may be available to her under Section 18 of the Securitization and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002.

3.

Dismissed as withdrawn. It shall, however, be open to the petitioner to take recourse to the remedies, as may be available to her, in accordance with law.

( AJAY KUMAR MITTAL ) JUDGE December 16, 2016 ( RAMENDRA JAIN ) rishu JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No Rishu Kataria 2016.12.19 11:38 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document