Anil Kumari Malik v. State Of Haryana And ORS

CWP-27059-2015 - 1IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-27059-2015 Date of decision: 07.07.2025 Anil Kumari Malik ....Petitioner

Versus

State of Haryana and others

...Respondents

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY ***** Present:- Mr. Sunil K. Nehra, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. R.S. Budhwar, Addl. A.G., Haryana.

Mr. A.S. Virk, Advocate for respondent No.3.

***** AMAN CHAUDHARY, J. (ORAL) 1.

Prayer made in the present petition is for quashing the office memo dated 22.10.2014 passed by respondent No.4-addressed to the respondent University.

2.

Learned counsel submits that the petitioner was appointed as Lecturer (Sociology) on 31.08.2004, Annexure P-2, however her services were dispensed with and she was relieved on 28.07.2007, after the University was formed and the College, where she was working came within its jurisdiction. A decision was taken by the Executive Council of the University on 23.06.2008 to absorb all the left over staff and her case as also that of Nishal Dalal @ Nisha Mohan was forwarded to the Government on 23.04.2014, Annexure P-13, whereafter on the asking of the Government, the matter was reconsidered and the names of both the aforesaid were dropped from the proposal on the ground that they were not working. HAMANT 2025.07.08 18:50 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

CWP-27059-2015 - 23.

Learned counsel for respondent No.3 states that another candidate has been regularly selected by following due process, wherein the petitioner had also participated.

4.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the present petition was ordered to be heard alongwith CWP-15027-2016, titled as Nisha Dalal @ Nisha Mohan vs. Bhagat Phool Singh Mahila Vishwavidyala and others, which came to be disposed of on 17.01.2025 on the statement of learned State counsel that the decision with regard to the sanction of post would be taken and conveyed to the University and prays that the present petition may also be disposed of in the same terms, to which learned counsel opposite have no objection.

5.

Ordered accordingly.

(AMAN CHAUDHARY) JUDGE 07.07.2025 Hemant Whether speaking/reasoned :

Yes / No Whether reportable :

Yes / No HAMANT 2025.07.08 18:50 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document