Balwinder Singh @ Binda@Rab v. State Of Punjab

CRM-M No.41514 of 2021 (O&M) ...1...

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH Sr.No.201 CRM-M No.41514 of 2021 (O&M) Date of Decision: 23rd February, 2022.

Balwinder Singh @ Binda @ Rab

...Petitioner

Versus

State of Punjab

...Respondent

CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MEENAKSHI I. MEHTA

Present:

Mr. Raj Karan Singh Verka, Advocate, for the petitioner.

Ms. Samina Dhir, DAG, Punjab.

* * * * MEENAKSHI I. MEHTA, J.

(ORAL) The petitioner herein has sought the relief of anticipatory bail in the criminal case arising out of the FIR bearing No.53 dated 28.04.2021 registered at Police Station Nurpur Bedi District Roopnagar, under Sections 307, 323, 324, 458, 506, 148 & 149 IPC and Section 25 of the Arms Act, 1959.

Learned State counsel, on the instructions from ASI Ram Kumar from the above-said Police Station, apprises the Court that in compliance of the order dated 04.10.2021 as passed by this Court, the petitioner has joined in the investigation and his custodial interrogation is not required and he is also not involved in any other criminal case of the similar nature.

In view of the afore-discussed submission as made by learned SEEMA SHARMA 2022.02.23 16:44 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document

CRM-M No.41514 of 2021 (O&M) ...2...

State counsel, the instant petition is allowed and the relief of interim bail, as extended to the petitioner named Balwinder Singh @ Binda @ Rab by this Court, vide the said order dated 04.10.2021, is hereby made absolute. However, the petitioner shall continue to join in the investigation as and when required/called upon to do so and shall also strictly abide by all the conditions as laid down in Section 438 (2) Cr.P.C. (MEENAKSHI I. MEHTA) JUDGE 23.02.2022.

seema Whether speaking/reasoned?

Yes Whether Reportable?

No SEEMA SHARMA 2022.02.23 16:44 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document