Nitin v. State Of Haryana

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH -.- CRM-M-31463-2026 (O&M) Date of Decision : 29.05.2026 Nitin ....Petitioner

VERSUS

State of Haryana ....Respondent CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.S.GREWAL

Present:

Mr. Sachin Kaushik, Advocate for the petitioner. -.- H.S.GREWAL J. (Oral) 1.

This petition has been preferred by the petitioner under Section 528 of BNSS, 2023 (erstwhile Section 482 Cr.P.C.), seeking quashing of the order dated 18.04.2026 (Annexure P-2) passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Narnaul in case FIR No.125 dated 15.04.2023, registered under Section 120-B, 216, 406, 419, 420, 467, 468, 471, 506 IPC (now Sections 61, 253, 316, 319, 318, 338, 336, 340, 351 of BNS, 2023) and Section 8(4) of Haryana Police Examination Act, 2021, at Police Station Sadar Mahendergarh whereby the bail bonds of the petitioner were cancelled and non-bailable warrants were issued against him. 2.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the trial Court has erred in cancelling the bail and forfeiting the bail bonds of the petitioner as no prior notice or an opportunity of hearing was granted to him. He further submits that the impugned order (Annexure P-2) has been passed in a mechanical manner and is, therefore, unsustainable under the law. Learned TRIPTI SAINI 2026.05.30 10:01 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

CRM-M-31463-2026 (O&M) -2counsel also submits that the petitioner undertakes to appear before the trial Court concerned on each and every date and would not absent himself without prior permission of the trial Court. It is, therefore, prayed that the petitioner may be permitted to surrender before the learned trial Court to attend the trial proceedings continuously and the impugned order may be set aside.

3.

Notice of motion.

4.

On the asking of the Court, Dr. Malvika Singh, AAG Haryana, accepts notice on behalf of the respondent.

5.

I have heard learned counsel for the parties and gone through the case file.

6.

In view of the facts and circumstances of this case, this Court does not find any legitimate ground to interfere with the impugned order. However, liberty is granted to the petitioner that in case, he surrenders before the trial Court within 07 days and moves an application for grant of bail, the same shall be considered and decided by the trial Court within a period of three days of filing of the said application in accordance with law. 7.

With these observations, the present petition stands disposed of. May 29, 2026 (H.S.GREWAL) tripti JUDGE Whether speaking/non-speaking : Speaking Whether reportable : Yes/No TRIPTI SAINI 2026.05.30 10:01 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document