Krishan Chand Goel And ANR v. State Of Haryana And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH CWP No. 4543 of 2013 Date of Decision:- 18.03.2016 Krishan Chand Goel and another ....Petitioners

Versus

State of Haryana and others ....Respondents

CORAM:

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE RITU BAHRI

Present:

Mr. Aditya Bhushan, Advocate, for petitioner No.1. Mr. Gaurav Deep Goyal, Advocate, for petitioner No.2. Mr. Keshav Gupta, Assistant Advocate General, Haryana. Mr. Vijay Dahiya, Advocate, for respondent Nos.5 and 6. **** RITU BAHRI, J. (Oral) Learned State counsel submits that the claim of leave encashment is pending under consideration in LPA No.1319 of 2015. Learned counsel appearing for petitioner Nos.1 and 2 submit that the payment has been made without giving the benefit of leave encashment and interest.

Learned counsel for respondent Nos.5 and 6 have placed on record the details of payment made to the petitioners. In view of above facts, the present petition is disposed of with the liberty to the petitioners to approach the concerned authority by way of representation with regard to the claim of leave encashment and interest, if any.

March 18, 2016 ( RITU BAHRI ) naresh.k JUDGE NARESH KUMAR 2016.03.28 11:50 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh