Neetu Bala v. Punjab School Education Board And ANR

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH CWP-27222-2015 (O&M) Date of decision: 16.01.2017 Neetu Bala

...Petitioner

Versus

Punjab School Education Board and another

...Respondents

CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JAISHREE THAKUR

Present:

Mr. Baljinder Singh Ichhewal, Advocate, for the petitioner.

Mr. Ranjit Singh Kalra, Advocate for the respondents.

**** JAISHREE THAKUR, J. (ORAL) Learned counsel for the respondents states that he would not like to file a written statement in this case. It is further submitted that after the orders passed in CWP No. 11300 of 2015 on 28.05.2015 the matter was considered by the respondent authorities which was also communicated to the petitioner. However, the said order has not been challenged and, therefore, the instant petition deserves to be dismissed at the very outset.

Faced with this learned counsel for the petitioner seeks to withdraw the writ petition with a liberty to challenge the said communication addressed to the petitioner.

Satyawan 2017.01.19 14:52 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document High Court Chandigarh

CWP-27222-2015 (O&M) -2The instant petition is disposed of with a liberty to the petitioner to challenge the orders passed subsequent to the passing of the orders in CWP No. 11300 of 2015 on 28.05.2015. 16.01.2017 (JAISHREE THAKUR) Satyawan JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned No.

Whether reportable No.

Satyawan 2017.01.19 14:52 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document High Court Chandigarh