Mohd Aslam v. State Of Punjab And ORS.

CWP No.22735 of 2017 [1]

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No. 22735 of 2017 Date of Decision: February 07 , 2020.

Mohd. Aslam ...... PETITIONER (s)

Versus

State of Punjab and others ...... RESPONDENT (s) CORAM:- HON'BLE MRS.JUSTICE LISA GILL

Present:

Ms. Ramneeq Kaur, Advocate for Mr. Sunny K.Singla, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. Harsimar Singh Sitta, AAG, Punjab.

Mr. G.S.Attariwala, Advocate for respondent No.2.

*****

1. Whether reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?

2. To be referred to the reporters or not?

3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the digest? ***** LISA GILL, J.

Prayer in this writ petition is for directing the official respondents to decide representation dated 02.08.2017 (Annexure P1) filed by the petitioner against respondent No.3 for raising illegal construction and for violating the terms and conditions of Change of Land Use (CLU) granted to respondent No.3company on 20.03.2006. OMKAR SINGH 2020.02.20 10:13 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document High Court, Chandigarh

CWP No.22735 of 2017 [2] As per the short reply filed by way of affidavit dated 13.09.2018 by Ms.Jiwan Jot Kaur, Regional Deputy Director, Local Government, Patiala, it is stated that the said representation has since been decided by the competent authority by passing a speaking order on 07.09.2018 attached as Annexure R1/3 alongwith the short reply dated 13.09.2018 filed on behalf of respondent No.1. Keeping in view the facts and circumstances as above, no further orders are called for in this writ petition. The same is disposed of accordingly. Needless to say, the petitioner is at liberty to challenge order dated 07.09.2018 in accordance with law.

( LISA GILL ) February 07 , 2020.

JUDGE 'om'

Whether speaking/reasoned:

Yes/No Whether reportable:

Yes/No OMKAR SINGH 2020.02.20 10:13 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document High Court, Chandigarh