← Library
High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCWP/18943/2020disposed of

Neetu Bala v. State Of Haryana And ANR

2020-11-10Mr. Justice Harsimran Singh Sethi2 pages

CWP-18943-2020 -1-

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH CWP-18943-2020 Date of decision: - 10.11.2020 Neetu Bala ....Petitioner

Versus

State of Haryana and another .....Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI Present:- Mr. Vikram Sheoran, Advocate and Mr. Keshav Pratap Singh, Advocate for the petitioner.

Ms. Rajni Gupta, Additional Advocate General, Haryana (keeping in view the advance copy given).

( Through video conferencing ) **** HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI , J. (ORAL) Present petition has been filed by the petitioner challenging the order dated 04.11.2020 (Annexure P-4), by which she has been transferred from Panchkula to Bhiwani.

After arguing for some time, learned counsels appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that petitioner will be satisfied, at this stage, in case, her case for adjusting at any vacant near by station is considered sympathetically by the government by passing an appropriate speaking order.

Learned State counsel submits that in case any such NARESH KUMAR 2020.11.10 16:26 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh

CWP-18943-2020 -2request/representation is made by the petitioner, appropriate order, by giving sympathetic consideration, will be passed and in case, it is found feasible to adjust the petitioner at any near by station, the same will be done by the appropriate authorities by passing an appropriate speaking order.

Learned State counsel further submits that in case any representation is made by the petitioner, the same will be decided at the earliest and not beyond a period of three weeks from submission of the said representation.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that keeping in view the statement of learned State counsel, they do not want to press this writ petition any further.

Keeping in view the above, the present writ petition is disposed of, having been not pressed, with the clear observation that the parties will be bound by their statements recorded above. ( HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI ) November 10, 2020 JUDGE naresh.k Whether reasoned/speaking?

Yes Whether reportable?

No NARESH KUMAR 2020.11.10 16:26 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh