Anil Rathi And Another v. State Of Haryana
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH 104A CRR No. 1937 of 2019 DATE OF DECISION :- 19.10.2024 Anil Rathi and another
...Petitioners
Versus
State of Haryana
...Respondent
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUMEET GOEL Present:- Mr. Sushil Jain, Advocate for the petitioners. Ms. Mahima Yashpal, DAG, Haryana.
Ms. Neeru Bansal, Advocate for the complainant. *** SUMEET GOEL , J.
(Oral) Learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that he may be permitted to withdraw the instant petition at this stage since an amicable settlement has been arrived between the parties & a compromise quashing petition (CRM-M-51078 of 2024) has also been preferred before this Court. Dismissed as withdrawn at this stage.
Needless to say that the petitioners shall be at liberty to revive the instant petition, if need so arises.
(SUMEET GOEL) JUDGE 19.10.2024 P.Singh Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No PARVINDER SINGH 2024.10.19 12:20 I agree to specified portions of this document chandigarh