Neha v. State Of Punjab & ORS.

HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-26525-2016 Date of Decision: November 13, 2017 Neha .....Petitioner

Versus

State of Punjab and others ......Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR MITTAL 1.

To be referred to the Reporters or not?

Yes/No 2.

Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Yes/No.

3.

Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? Yes/No .......

Present:

Ms.Sonal Dutta, Advocate for Mr.Vikas Mohan Gupta, Advocate for the petitioner. Ms.Anu Pal, AAG, Punjab.

Mr.T.S.Chauhan & Mr.Satnam Chauhan, Advocates for respondent No.2.

Mr.S.S.Walia, Advocate for respondent Nos.3 and 4. ........

SURYA KANT, J.

The petitioner has got admission in BAMS Course in some other College and as such she does not want to press her claim for admission in respondent No.3-College. Her counsel submits and rightly so that the petitioner is entitled to refund of the fee deposited by her in accordance with the Rules/provisions in the prospectus.

[2] The writ petition is accordingly disposed of with direction to respondent Nos.2 and 3 to determine the amount to which the petitioner is entitled to be refunded. The needful be done within a period of one month from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order. ( SURYA KANT ) JUDGE November 13, 2017 ( SUDHIR MITTAL ) meenuss JUDGE 1.

Whether speaking/reasoned ?

Yes/No 2.

Whether reportable ?

Yes/No Meenu 2017.11.16 16:41 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document chandigarh