Sanjay v. State Of Haryana
!"# $%&%!'())
( *+ ) , , ,
!
"""" , , -)
# $
%&'
(
)
$ *'+&
#
,-
*'* ./01.0.&$
.02#32
323.+4.'
$# *'5/
67
-1-
8$ ) 9
4 7
$
./ 4 */
:(
)
)
# $ ) # 8$
0%**.0.&
) $
# 0*
)# #
( 0%**.0.%,$
$ $
$
#
(
#
7
) $
)
)
( $
$
);$
# $
$#)
$
#
( 7
) $
)#
#
( 0%**.0.% .
( $
$
#
7 / <
( 0%**.0.%
)#
) 8
!
"
# -2-
$ $
$
$
% & '( )* +)+, - "./
0"0"1+1"+)+, 2
&
'( )* +)+,
'+ '+ +)+,
3 $ $
4
5
67068 0 $ 9 Learned State Counsel has duly acknowledged that petitioner is regularly appearing before learned Special Court and there is no allegation that in case interim bail is made absolute, he is likely to misuse the concession or hamper the proceedings in any manner. There has been no progress of trial after
)#
-$
$
$
$ 0 ;$
-
)#
0%**.0.% ) # $ # )
# $
# :$
#
( :(
9$
: $
1
4
$
(
7 $ ) 23 -3-
< # #
#
$ =
)
-
) $
#
$# #
)
23 2 $ 34 5- , , ! :
$6 ;6< :
;6< -4-