Karamjit Singh And Another v. State Of Punjab And Another




    




 



 




    !"#$%%  &&&&&'  (  #'")% &&&&&*      



  '   &+ * #$% ,-  %* & 


      .%*  !*$$%  

&

&  /,0 ' 1*)  % $  2%$ % #%)3+4&
 
 #(  !"#$% % /5 $

!#6+(  !"#$%, & !*$  1 $2+4&


&

&
7 # 

 +'  $ ' # # %  2%$ %#%) 5% ) **  # 

  &'&&  !-  )  %  * 8    

$  '9 !* 6 5 #$%'9 &"%!  %  %  0!5!!*$  
& 7&   /,0   '1  *  )   ,  # $ 2%$ %#%) #(  !"#$% % ) $4& 7  5% )  -*  )

%* 5 !&

  & :   %* )!%% 

 % 

!%**  ) %*   #

 &'&&5%** $%%  * *-&:  5%  5$%%    %  !    )%  %  )-!  5  && !* 6 5 #$%'9 &"%! 5%% %-  )  0    ,0   '
   '  )!  % - 

 %  * -    5%  %  )  $$  )  % *   * !* ;5% * " ) %!* *  % %5& :  )!%%* %5$$5  %;5%% 5)$$%*; %  !&%" 5 )  ! %% *          5       ! $    "& : 

%   *   $%!*$   )%%!* '9 &"%! ) 

 %  0!&+**    %)* )     %* *     




 ! "

& & +  %-  %          %  *    * %  -!    &

4 )  #  

  &'&& !*5  %      !! 0! * 5 $;     % * $ % %5- %*5 ! )0 ) %  ** " !&

 , *     %  !        -   %  % -    '9
 6 5  #$%  5      
&
&

&
&
   

  

&
<&  #!

 %  -   '9 &"%! 5  &
&
&'  % ** ; **  #

 &'&& 

$'9
6 5 #$%  % 0! 5   ) %*   $  5%%5!)

%   -   & & 
&+!   % %  **  ) %*  *     

$   '9  &  "%  !  %  )  !&  2 % !   % **    ;  5  !%   &&  !      % -'9
'9%)  5   %   ** 5!) %   & .%    )

    %  !*   **   5   -     )  % *   0!$)%%5&% **  %-**  #

 &'&& )$  " % %  5%%%)*$ %  
7&.%3=) #* !   #$  !

% & %





' 5%  $5%! %) - 
38. At this juncture, we think it apt to state that the exercise of power under


 r.P.C. can be sought to be invoked either by the prosecution or by the accused persons or by the Court itself. The High Court has been moved by the ground that the accused persons are in the custody and the concept of speedy trial is not nullified and no prejudice is caused, and, therefore, the principle of magnanimity should apply. Suffice it to say, a criminal trial does not singularly centres around the accused. In it there is

 involvement of the prosecution, the victim and the victim represents the collective. The cry of the collective may not be uttered in decibels which is physically audible in the court premises, but the Court has to remain sensitive to such silent cries and the agonies, for the society seeks justice. Therefore, a balance has to be struck. We have already explained the use of the words "magnanimous approach" and how it should be understood. Regard being had to the concept of balance, and weighing the factual score on the scale of balance, we are of the convinced opinion that the High Court has fallen into absolute error in axing the order passed by the learned trial Judge. If we allow ourselves to say, when the concept of fair trial is limitlessly stretched, having no boundaries, the orders like the present one may fall in the arena of sanctuary of errors. Hence, we reiterate the necessity of doctrine of balance."
& .%"$!   

     *)    %* 5 !%   )$  $%)          %   %  $%    0!%55  -  5%%% * 55  0!

% !>%

5% %% !     %  

 %  *   5  %  )   0! 0-

) %  %* & 7& ,; %)- %  !  %* *&.%! %   !&

35-      !     %   %$  ) - % )-%

) )0* * %! %&

 !"#$# %


 &