Jaina Ram v. State Of Haryana & ORS
2023:PHHC:092239
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH CWP-26648-2016 DECIDED ON: 20.07.2023 JAINA RAM .....PETITIONER
VERSUS
STATE OF HARYANA & ORS .....RESPONDENTS CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP MOUDGIL
Present:
None for the petitioner.
***** SANDEEP MOUDGIL, J (ORAL) A perusal of the order sheet shows that on 15.07.2019, 27.11.2019 and 31.03.2022, none has put in appearance on behalf of the petitioner. On 15.07.2022 and 25.01.2023, counsel for the petitioner had appeared but sought time to address the arguments and last opportunity was granted to him. Despite second call, none has put in appearance on behalf of the petitioner. This court is fully convinced that petitioner is not interested in pursuing the present writ petition, hence the present writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution.
Dismissed for want of prosecution.
(SANDEEP MOUDGIL) 20.07.2023 JUDGE Kusum Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No KUSUM 2023.07.24 11:27 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment Punjab & Haryana High Court, CHD