Nirmal Singh v. Deputy Commissioner Cum District Magistrate And Others

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH CWP-17298-2026 Date of Decision: 27.05.2026 NIRMAL SINGH

...Petitioner

Versus

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER-CUM-DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, KURUKSHETRA AND ORS

...Respondents

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUVIR SEHGAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS SURI Present:- Mr. Randeep Singh Dhakla, Advocate, for the petitioner. ***** SUVIR SEHGAL , J. (ORAL) 1.

In view of the judgments passed by the Supreme Court in Union of India vs. Satyawati Tandon, (2010) 8 SCC 110; PHR Invent Educational Society vs. UCO Bank and others, (2024) 6 SCC 579; and South India Bank Ltd. and others vs. Naveen Mathew Philip and another, (2023) 17 SCC 311, writ petition is not maintainable and is dismissed as such.

2.

Liberty is granted to the petitioner to take recourse to the remedy available under the SARFAESI Act.

( SUVIR SEHGAL ) JUDGE ( VIKAS SURI ) May 27, 2026 JUDGE harish Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No HARISH KUMAR 2026.05.29 19:08 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment