Karamjit Singh v. State Of Punjab

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH 208
     CRM-M-37173 of 2020 (O&M) Date of Decision: 05.02.2021 Karamjit Singh

...Petitioner

Versus

State of Punjab

...Respondent

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMOL RATTAN SINGH Present:- Mr. Shakti Mehta, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Ramdeep Partap Singh, DAG, Punjab ***** AMOL RATTAN SINGH, J. (Oral) Case heard by video conferencing.

By this petition, filed under the provisions of Section 439 of the Cr.P.C, the petitioner seeks the concession of 'regular bail', upon FIR no.0232, dated 26.09.2020, having been registered at Police Station City Rajpura, District Patiala, alleging therein the commission of offences punishable under Sections 452, 354, 341, 323 and 506 of the IPC. Pursuant to the order dated 16.11.2020, today a reply by way of an affidavit of the DSP, Rajpura, dated 19.01.2021, is on record, wherein the facts of the case have been given (as per the investigation conducted), with it also stated that the report under Section 173 of the Cr.P.C. has been presented before the trial court, with learned State counsel submitting that the charge is still to be framed against the petitioner. Upon further query to the learned State counsel, he submits that as per his instructions there is no other criminal case registered against the petitioner, who has been in custody since September 26, 2020. VIKAS CHANDER 2021.02.06 15:13 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

208
  CRM-M-37173 of 2020 (O&M) -2That being so, without making any comment on the actual merits of the case, the present petition is allowed, with the petitioner ordered to be admitted to bail, upon his furnishing adequate bail and surety bonds to the satisfaction of the trial court/CJM/Duty Magistrate concerned. 05.02.2021 (AMOL RATTAN SINGH) vcgarg JUDGE



 

  





 


VIKAS CHANDER 2021.02.06 15:13 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document