Surender And ANR v. Commissioner Rohtak Division, Rohtak And ORS
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND
HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP No.5118 of 2013 Date of Decision.20.03.2017 Surender and another ........Petitioners Vs Commissioner, Rohtak Division, Rohtak and others ........Respondents
Present:
Mr. Sanjiv Gupta, Advocate for the petitioners.
CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT RAWAL -.- AMIT RAWAL J.(ORAL) This Court had adjourned the matter sine die on 27.01.2014 as the order of this Court dated 12.03.2013 calling upon the petitioner to place on record the documents to establish the title had not been complied with. It is a case where the eviction proceedings had been initiated and there was no interim stay by this Court. By this time, the order passed by this Court must have been implemented. I am of the view that the petitioners are not interested in pursuing the matter.
At this stage, Mr. Sanjiv Gupta, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that his clients have not approached him for the purpose of the compliance of the order.
No ground for interference is made out. The writ petition is dismissed.
(AMIT RAWAL) JUDGE March 20, 2017 Pankaj* Whether speaking/reasoned Yes Whether reportable No PANKAJ KUMAR 2017.03.22 11:39 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document