Vijay Inder Singh v. State Of Haryana And Another

-1CRM-M-31589-2025

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH (206) CRM-M-31589-2025 Date of Decision:-02.09.2025 Vijay Inder Singh ......Petitioner

Versus

State of Haryana and another ......Respondents

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK JAIN ****

Present:

Mr. Parunjeet Singh, Advocate for the petitioner. Ms. Swati Batra, Senior DAG, Haryana.

Ms. Maneesha Kumari, Advocate for Mr. Vaibhav Sharma, Advocate for respondent No. 2. **** ALOK JAIN, J. (Oral) 1.

The present petition has been filed under Section 482 of BNSS, 2023 for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner in case FIR No. 84 dated 28.03.2025, under Sections 323, 498-A and 506 of Indian Penal Code, registered at Police Station Butana, District Karnal (Annexure P-1).

2.

Vide order dated 04.06.2025, a Co-ordinate Bench of this Court while granting the concession of interim anticipatory bail directed the petitioner to join investigation.

3.

Subsequently, vide order dated 13.06.2025, the matter was referred to the Mediation and Conciliation Centre as the parties are ad idem that there are chances of amicable settlement. PARUL 2025.09.03 18:21 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document

-2CRM-M-31589-2025 4.

However, as per the report received from the Mediator, the mediation was a non-starter as respondent No. 1 never appeared which was a clear violation of the order passed by this Court on 13.06.2025. 5.

Learned State counsel on instructions from PSI Sachin states that the petitioner has joined the investigation and his custodial interrogation is no longer required.

6.

In light of the above, the present petition is allowed. The order dated 04.06.2025 granting interim anticipatory bail to the petitioner, is made absolute. However, the petitioner shall join the investigation as and when called upon to do so by the Investigating Agency and shall abide by the conditions of Section 482 of BNSS, 2023.

7.

However, nothing stated above shall be construed as a final expression of opinion on the merits of the case. 8.

It is made clear that, in case, the petitioner is found involved in any such activity once again, the present concession granted shall automatically stand vacated.

9.

It is further made clear that this order shall not be construed as parity qua any other co-accused.

(ALOK JAIN) JUDGE September 02, 2025 Parul Whether speaking/reasoned:- Yes/No Whether Reportable:- Yes/No PARUL 2025.09.03 18:21 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document