High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCWP/3296/2015dismissed

Rajinder Jain And ANR v. State Of Haryana And ANR

2015-08-21Mr. Justice Surinder Gupta,Mr. Justice Fateh Deep Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH CM No. 10107-CWP of 2015 in/and CWP No. 3296 of 2015 Decided on : 21.08.2015 Rajinder Jain and another . . . Petitioners

Versus

State of Haryana and another . . . Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR MITTAL HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE REKHA MITTAL PRESENT: Mr. Sunil Chadha, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Kirpal Singh Thakur, Advocate for the applicant-petitioners.

Mr. Saurabh Mago, AAG, Haryana.

**** AJAY KUMAR MITTAL, J. (Oral) CM No. 10107-CWP of 2015 This is an application filed under Section 151 of the CPC, seeking withdrawal of the writ petition, in which the arguments were heard and the judgment was reserved on July 31, 2015. It has been averred in the application that the petitioners wish to withdraw the instant writ petition with liberty to avail the alternative remedy, if any.

Notice of this application.

Mr. Saurabh Mago, AAG, Haryana, accepts notice on behalf of the non-applicant/respondents and pleads no objection to the withdrawal of the writ petition.

After hearing learned counsel for the parties and perusing the JAWALA RAM 2015.08.27 10:46 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh

CM No. 10107-CWP of 2015 in/and [ 2 ] CWP No. 3296 of 2015 averments made in the application, which is supported by an affidavit of Sh. Sushil Kumar S/o Sh. Ram Karan Gupta (General Power of Attorney of Sh. Rajinder Jain, petitioner No.1), the Civil Miscellaneous Application is hereby allowed and the applicant-petitioners are permitted to withdraw the writ petition, with liberty as prayed for.

CWP No. 3296 of 2015 In the present writ petition arguments were heard and the judgment was reserved on July 31, 2015. In the meantime, a Civil Miscellaneous Application No.10107-CWP of 2015 was filed by the petitioners seeking withdrawal of the instant writ petition with liberty to avail the alternative remedy, if any, available to them. 2.

In view of the order of even date passed in CM No. 10107CWP of 2015, the present writ petition is taken up for re-hearing and is dismissed as withdrawn as prayed. Accordingly, the petitioners shall be at liberty to avail alternative remedy, if any, available to them in accordance with law.

(AJAY KUMAR MITTAL) JUDGE (REKHA MITTAL) August 21, 2015 JUDGE J.Ram JAWALA RAM 2015.08.27 10:46 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh