High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCWP/27249/2016disposed of

M/S Garga Associates v. State Of Punjab & Others

2016-12-23Mr. Justice T.H.B. Chalapathi2 pages

Civil Writ Petition No.27249 of 2016 ...1...

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No.27249 of 2016 Date of Decision: December 23, 2016 M/s Garga Associates

...Petitioner

Versus

State of Punjab & Ors.

...Respondents

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAMESHWAR SINGH MALIK

Present:

Mr.Rajesh Kumar Girdhar, Advocate, for the petitioner.

RAMESHWAR SINGH MALIK, J.(Oral) Feeling aggrieved against the alleged inaction on the part of respondent authorities, petitioner has approached this Court, by way of present writ petition under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India, seeking a writ in the nature of Mandamus.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that when the genuine grievance of the petitioner was not being redressed, he finally approached the respondent authorities by way of self-contained representation dated 25.11.2016 (Annexure P-2) but the same is also pending decision. He further submits that petitioner will be satisfied in case respondent No.4 is directed to consider and decide the representation of the petitioners within a reasonable time. Having heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and without expressing any opinion on merits of the case, the Executive Seema Sharma 2016.12.23 15:45 I attest the accuracy and authencity of the document

Civil Writ Petition No.27249 of 2016 ...2...

Engineer, Bathinda,-respondent No.4 is directed to look into the matter, consider the grievance raised by the petitioner, vide his representation dated 25.11.2016 (Annexure P-2) and decide the same at an early date, by passing an appropriate order thereon, strictly in accordance with law but in any case within a period of one month from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order.

It is further directed that if due consideration of the matter, respondent No.4 comes to the conclusion that petitioner is entitled for the amount being sought to be released, the same shall be released in favour of the petitioner, without any further loss of time. With the abovesaid observations made and directions issued, instant writ petition stands disposed of.

December 23, 2016 (RAMESHWAR SINGH MALIK) seema JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No Seema Sharma 2016.12.23 15:45 I attest the accuracy and authencity of the document