High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCRM-M/41885/2021disposed of

Gurpreet Singh v. State Of Punjab

2022-02-08Mrs. Justice Meenakshi I. Mehta2 pages

CRM-M No.41885 of 2021 ..1..

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M No.41885 of 2021 Date of Decision: 08th February, 2022.

Gurpreet Singh

...Petitioner

Versus

State of Punjab

...Respondent

(Heard through Video-Conferencing) CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MEENAKSHI I. MEHTA

Present:

Mr. Deepak Aggarwal Advocate, for the petitioner.

Mr. C.L.Pawar, Senior Deputy Advocate General, Punjab.

* * * * MEENAKSHI I. MEHTA, J.

(ORAL) The petitioner herein has sought the relief of anticipatory bail in the criminal case arising out of the FIR bearing No.125 dated 10.07.2021 registered at Police Station Civil Lines, District Bathinda, under Sections 419, 420 & 120-B IPC.

Learned State counsel, on the instructions from ASI Sukhwinder Singh from the above-said Police Station, apprises the Court that in compliance of the order dated 06.10.2021 as passed by the Co-ordinate Bench, the petitioner has joined in the investigation and his custodial interrogation is not required and he is also not involved in any other criminal case of the similar nature.

In view of the afore-discussed submission as made by learned State counsel, the instant petition is allowed and the relief of interim bail, as SEEMA SHARMA 2022.02.08 16:31 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document

CRM-M No.41885 of 2021 ..2..

extended to the petitioner by the Co-ordinate Bench vide the said order dated 06.10.2021, is hereby made absolute.

However, the petitioner shall continue to join in the investigation as and when required/called upon to do so and shall also strictly abide by all the conditions as laid down in Section 438 (2) Cr.P.C. (MEENAKSHI I. MEHTA) JUDGE 08.02.2022.

seema Whether speaking/reasoned?

Yes Whether Reportable?

No SEEMA SHARMA 2022.02.08 16:31 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document