← Library
High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCRM-M/38837/2024allowed

Babli And Others v. State Of Punjab And Others

2024-09-10Mr. Justice N.S. Shekhawat2 pages

CRM-M-38837-2024 -1- 2024:PHHC:119020

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-38837-2024 Date of decision: 10.09.2024 BABLI AND OTHERS

...Petitioners

VERSUS

STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS

...Respondents

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE N. S. SHEKHAWAT

Present:

Mr. Varun Sharma, Advocate for the petitioners.

Mr. Deepinder Brar, Sr. DAG, Punjab.

Mr. Rajesh Kumar Sharma, Advocate for respondent No.2.

**** N. S. SHEKHAWAT, J. (Oral) 1.

The instant petition has been filed under Section under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 for quashing of an FIR No. 107 dated 08.09.2023 under Sections 149, 323, 341 and 506 IPC registered at Police Station Basti Bawa Khel, District Jalandhar, (Annexure P-1) alongwith all the consequential proceedings arising therefrom on the basis of compromise dated 08.05.2024 (Annexure P-2).

2.

Vide order dated 12.08.2024 while issuing notice of motion, this Court had directed the parties to appear before the Illaqa Magistrate/trial Magistrate for getting their statements recorded with respect to the compromise dated 08.05.2024 (Annexure P-2).

3.

Pursuant to aforesaid order, the parties have appeared before the Judicial Magistrate First Class, Jalandhar and got their statements recorded. Report dated 03.09.2024 has been received whereby after recording the MAMTA 2024.09.11 17:15 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment

CRM-M-38837-2024 -2- 2024:PHHC:119020 statements of the parties, the Court below has shown its satisfaction that the compromise is genuine, voluntary and without any coercion or undue influence. 4.

I have heard counsel for the parties and gone through the case file. 5.

In the light of the satisfaction shown by the Court below and considering the offence for which the accused have been charged are not of serious nature, together with the fact that compromise will go a long way in ironing out the differences for betterment of future life of the parties and also in view of the law laid down in Gian Singh Vs. State of Punjab and another, 2012 (4) RCR (Criminal) 543 and Kulwinder Singh and others Vs. State of Punjab 2007(3) RCR (Criminal) 1052, the present petition for quashing the FIR is allowed qua the petitioners.

6.

Resultantly, FIR No. 107 dated 08.09.2023 under Sections 149, 323, 341 and 506 IPC registered at Police Station Basti Bawa Khel, District Jalandhar, (Annexure P-1) alongwith all consequential proceedings arising therefrom are hereby quashed qua the petitioners. (N. S. SHEKHAWAT) 10.09.2024 JUDGE M.Sikka Whether speaking/reasoned :

Yes/No Whether reportable :

Yes/No MAMTA 2024.09.11 17:15 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment