Lakhwinder Singh @ Dulla And ORS v. State Of Punjab And Others



  
        
  



!"#"

$ %  & '&

()*+"$ , -"$.* / 011 $

* ,#

&&&&&& 

"

"

$ ,# ,#0# - 

0$34 $

* ,#

&&&&&&  #5 $ $ #
 %

 6( & -

 7 

 


 








 




 


!!!!

 7 

&

9,1:

"
#"






$% &%

'()
 *+

,- ./ .,+
%


  


0/
 
/.*
,01

,0+

(2




2"

3






 .+ ..
4 5
67

8
,* .

.,

#%

#
6 9:%







01
2 


$
&%
 '()
 *+

,- ./ .,+
%



0/;  ;/.*;,01;,0+
(2









%


# 
5
6


#
  :




 

%







 (&
%;:
2

* .

.,

%









 
"



#
  %




:
2
# 


2


%#

 




 

"

%

#



"

 

"
#



:
(&
%;:
2
#
 

2
#




"
 


#
"

 




 47




"


 %
%
 :
#




(&
%;: 2
 

, .

., < 







2 =
%


.

.

.,



#
 $









2


 #6 955

%"


 "
 

 


"



 #







 




#
 



%
#
" 

#
"














 

%
%
 < Mr. Sharma points out that one of the accused namely, Arshi Barnala @ Arshdeep Singh has not been impleaded and has not been joined as petitioner in the present petition.

 Mr. Barnala submits that in fact the said accused is now based out of India and he could not join as petitioner. Mr. Sharma submits that though as per the report, the parties have compromised, but the fact remains that offence punishable under Sections 452, 148 and 149 of the IPC are non compoundable. In response thereto, learned counsel for the petitioners relies upon the judgment passed by the Supreme Court in Criminal Appeal No.1489 of 2012, titled as 'Ramgopal and another vs. The State of Madhya Pradesh'. The relevant portion of which reads as under>6 9,,

:




#

?6  @



"

 


5


#

 .
2  "


"


# 








.
2  2
#


5

 A%
:





 %"
 
%%


.
2  
#
"

"

#



 


$

? @
 #


"
$


   


 



#

#$



.
2 



 %
% $%

#
"

B%
2

 


01
2 
:
B%
2
$% 
#







 

 




01 2 




 




"

2
;





 <

;

C%

#

#

#
"

2

 







#
'()
 *+ 
,- ./ .,+
%



 

 0/
 
/.*
,01

,0+

(2



2"

3




%
%
, are, hereby, quashed qua the petitioners.

9 7 

:

  & '&

3 D
$%; E D
)