← Library
High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCWP/22083/2018disposed of

Jarnail Singh & Others v. State Of Haryana And Others

2018-08-31Mr. Justice Ajay Kumar Mittal,Dr. Justice S. Muralidhar2 pages

CWP-22083-2018 -1IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-22083-2018 Date of Decision: August 31, 2018 Jarnail Singh and others .....Petitioners

Versus

State of Haryana and others ......Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDIP AHLUWALIA

Present:

Mr.N.S.Swaitch, Advocate for the petitioners. ........

SURYA KANT, J.(ORAL) The case of the petitioners is that their land was acquired by State of Haryana for construction of Sewerage Disposal Works adjoining Sector 20, Panchkula vide Award dated 24.06.1997. The petitioners, thus, fall in the category of 'Oustees' and claimed allotment of plots under the 'Oustees Policy'. They are said to have been approached the Authorities many a times including vide application dated 17.10.2013 alongwith requisite earnest money of `50,000/- in favour of Estate Officer, HUDA, Panchkula. The grievance in the instant writ petition is that no decision is being taken in respect of their claim, though they also served the HUDA authorities with a Legal Notice dated 21.05.2018 (Annexure P-3) also.

[2] Having heard learned counsel for the petitioners and keeping in view the averments made in the writ petition but without expressing any views on the merits of their claim, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondents to decide petitioners' claim regarding allotment MEENU 2018.09.

CWP-22083-2018 -2of plots under the 'Oustees Policy' within a period of four months from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order. ( SURYA KANT ) JUDGE August 31, 2018 ( SUDIP AHLUWALIA ) meenuss JUDGE 1.

Whether speaking/reasoned ?

Yes/No 2.

Whether reportable ?

Yes/No MEENU 2018.09.05 10:54 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document chandigarh