Krishan Lal Sharma And Others v. State Of Punjab And Another
!
!! KRISHAN LAL SHARMA AND OTHERS ... Petitioners "#$ STATE OF PUNJAB AND ANOTHER ... Respondents % &'% (" ( )
!
" # $% #
&% $% ! " ( ) * #+, '
( ! % ) * * +,% !- . /'
/.
/'0% ...')1'2! 3* $%% 4 5%6'7 83- ') /'
/.
/'04 5%67% .'..9.926&')1'2! 3* ./)3* : 4 ./) .926& : % 7 $%% 8; %
! /0 //4 5%.7 # : % ! %# : 4 7
-2- % ! - . /'
/.
/'0% ...')1'2! 3* $%% 4 5%6'7 83- ') /'
/.
/'04 5%67% .'..9.926&')1'2! 3* ./)3* : 4 ./) .926& : 7 $%% 8; % :
! #!#
#
# 3 !% %#
: !! % ! ! : : % % .
< '0 ''
// '0 ' // / /.
/' : #! 3,
3, : !% % !
:
3 ! %# =% $%% # ! 9 / / /'
(%# =% $%% % 6
!
!
"
#
$ (!%& ! *%
!>
-3-
!
""
#
$ %
# # % %&'()
* + ,'&
* * )
-
* - -
. - %&/(& '
(
'
& '
) '*0 1 2
3 >) .
$ %45() .
. .
+
* +
!
. %46( 7
4&5%/(
* *
,'&
* * %4&()
8
.
,'&
* *
- . - 9
:
* + ,'&
* *
-4-
)
+
.
%44()
* *
* ,'& ;
*
8
:
4&5
* *
. %4,( ) ,'&
* * + <+:9 2 *
)
+
: 0 * ! +
) ,'&
* *
0
0 * +
) +
) *
+ :
) *
: =
*
( : ! ,% ! % : # ? @#% *%
!+
,
* % $
$
! !
!% # !5 :% ):%;
-5- # ? @# % *%
! > - .
/ # #
+
$
12$*
5 % $1')
.
3 $1'$
,'&
0 *
. )
0 * > $1'
)
.
0 * 8
;
=
.
?
4&5
* * 6/@4 )
8 ,'&
:
$1'!
8 + .
,'&
0 *
. .
+
> $1'2 ?
0 *
+> %(
. %(
> $1'%)
;
= 8
+
> $1'1
+
,'&
0 *
-6-
0
8
!
)
> $1'
"
)
+
8 > $1'3 *
8
> $1'0
0 * 8
.> $1'$ ) +
6A ' 6A / <
:
) 0 * . 8
! : ) 8
:! #% ! % %!% % :%## % ! ( !% ! + # : !
% # !
-7- ) ( ? A# % *%
! 4"# 5
&
$
)67869
3!*
: # ; %
: % ! % 5#
! !! ! % % % ,% ! : :% %# *% ,% 83- : !
( # ! ? A# % *% 5 % >6/ ?
4&5* *
* 8
B C
!
+ :
. 0 * ,'&* *
* " 6,&
* !
4&5* * 7
+
+ 8 3
>
. > D
> E *
F
% ! : ! ! 6 B 83- ,% % .'..9.926&')'23* ./)3*: ?: % ./) 3* .926&3*: 3 # !
%!! # : % ! %
-8- % 6 # ! # ( !
$%% # % ( %!! % ,% % % % % ! * % ! + ! % - %# % %! + %
! % ! 6 (% + %# !:
* % ! + # 5 !%
+
! % (!! ,% # % #+ !
%# 3 # % % % #
% %#%
%# ! % + # % % ! 10.
Considering the facts of the instant case and noticing the principles laid down by the Apex Court in "Gian Singh Versus State of Punjab and another", (2012) 10 SCC 303, "Ramgopal and another versus State of Madhya Pradesh" reported as 2021 SCC ONLINE SC 834 and also by the Full Bench of this Court in "Kulwinder Singh and others versus State of Punjab and another", 2007 (3) RCR (Criminal) 1052, that the dispute involved in the instant case pertains to offence in DDR No.43 dated 01.03.2016 under Sections 452, 324, 323, 148 & 149 in FIR No.18 dated 01.03.2016 under Sections 341, 323, 427, 379-B, 148 & 149 IPC which
-9cannot be perceived as falling within the prohibited category or as an offence that is heinous and grossly shocking to the conscience of the Court or having a wide pervasive impact on the social or public order, the instant petition is allowed and the case DDR No.43 dated 01.03.2016 under Sections 452, 324, 323, 148 & 149 of the IPC registered at Police Station Guruhar Sahai (Annexure P-1) in FIR No.18 dated 01.03.2016 (Annexure P-2) under Sections 341, 323, 427, 379-B, 148 & 149 of the IPC and Section 308 IPC was added later on (Sections 308 and 379-B were deleted during investigation) registered at Police Station Guruhar Sahai, District Ferozepur and all subsequent proceedings arising therefrom are hereby quashed, qua the petitioners in light of the compromise dated 25.06.2020 (Annexure P-3). However, the same would be subject to payment of costs of Rs. 5,000/- by each petitioner to be deposited with the "Punjab and Haryana High Court Bar Clerk's Association" within one month from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order.
: *" ( ),
' -!
!! D
B + C
DC B - #
DC