P.C. Bansal v. State Of Haryana And ORS.

-1CWP No.3519 of 2015

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH CWP No.3519 of 2015 Date of decision: 09.05.2016 Prem Chand Bansal ....Petitioner

Versus

State of Haryana and others ....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PARAMJEET SINGH DHALIWAL 1) Whether Reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment ?

2) To be referred to the Reporters or not ?

3) Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest ? Present: - Mr. Rajesh Lamba, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Rajneesh Chadwal, DAG, Haryana.

PARAMJEET SINGH DHALIWAL, J. (ORAL) Instant writ petition under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India has been filed for issuance of a writ in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents to consider the case of the petitioner as mentioned in representations dated 25.08.2014 (Annexure P-6) and dated 10.12.2014 (Annexure P-7).

Learned counsel for the petitioner does not press the present writ petition on merits, however, prays that respondent No.2 - Additional Deputy Commissioner be directed to look into representations dated 25.08.2014 (Annexure P-6) and dated 10.12.2014 (Annexure P-7).

Having heard learned counsel for the petitioner and after RAVINDER SINGH 2016.05.11 10:34 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document

-2CWP No.3519 of 2015 perusing the paper-book, however, without commenting on merits of the case, instant petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No.2 - Additional Deputy Commissioner, to look into the grievance of the petitioner specifically made in representations dated 25.08.2014 (Annexure P-6) and dated 10.12.2014 (Annexure P-7) and take appropriate action in accordance with law preferably within a period of six months from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order. (Paramjeet Singh Dhaliwal) Judge May 09, 2016 R.S.

RAVINDER SINGH 2016.05.11 10:34 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document