Ranuk Ram v. Financial Commissioner, Haryana And Others

CWP-3572-2015 (O&M) -1IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-3572-2015 (O&M) Date of Decision: April 16, 2024 Ranuk Ram ......Petitioner

Versus

The Financial Commissioner and others ......Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAJESH BHARDWAJ

Present:

Mr.Vishal Garg Narwana, Advocate with Mr.Rajat Sheokand, Advocate for the petitioner.

Ms.Upasana Dhawan, AAG, Haryana.

Mr.Rahul Aggarwal, Advocate for Mr.Rahul Sharma, Advocate for respondent No.6.

........

RAJESH BHARDWAJ, J.(ORAL) CM-14925-CWP-2023 Instant application has been filed for impleading the legal heirs of deceased Ram Bhaj (respondent No.5).

After hearing learned counsel for the parties and for the reasons mentioned in the application, the same is allowed. Legal heirs of respondent No.5-Ram Bhaj, as mentioned in para No.2 of the application are allowed to be impleaded as party/respondents in this case. Amended memo of parties is taken on record.

Main case Petitioner has approached this Court praying for quashing of MEENU 2024.04.16 16:40 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

CWP-3572-2015 (O&M) -2order dated 15.03.2012, Annexure P-6, passed by respondent No.1 whereby order dated 12.03.2010, Annexure P-5, passed by respondent No.2, vide which executive appeal No.548 of 2007 (partition) filed by respondent No.5 has been accepted being wrong, illegal, perverse and against the settled principles of law.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that during pendency of the present petition, both the parties have amicably resolved the issue by way of compromise. It is also submitted that it is the part of compromise that impugned order be set aside and partition be carried out as per terms and conditions of the compromise. He further submits that settlement deed, dated 18.08.2023, has also been placed on record as Annexure A-1 and hence the present petition be disposed of in view of the same. Learned counsel for private respondent has also endorsed the compromise arrived at between the parties and submits that the petition be disposed of in view of the compromise.

In view of the above statement made by learned counsel for the parties, the present petition is disposed of in view of the compromise arrived at between the parties. Order, dated 15.03.2012, Annexure P-6, is set aside. However, parties would be bound by the terms and conditions of the compromise, Annexure A-1.

April 16, 2024 ( RAJESH BHARDWAJ ) meenuss JUDGE 1.

Whether speaking/reasoned ?

Yes/No 2.

Whether reportable ?

Yes/No MEENU 2024.04.16 16:40 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document