Gaushala Samana v. State Of Punjab Through Divisional Forest Officer Patiala And Others

APURVA 2025.05.02 09:14 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document/judgment High Court, Chandigarh

  

 Khewat No.1715/1710, Khatauni No.2493 and Khasra No.102//26 (30-0) and 118//26 (14-19), however, the petitioner is not in possession of any of the portion of the said land. It is submitted that under the garb of impugned order(s) dated 29.11.2022 (Annexure P-4), the State Authorities are trying to forcibly evict the petitioner from the land under his possession, i.e. land comprised in Khewat No.276/273, as per Jamabandi for the year 2016-17 (Annexure P-2).

3.

At this stage, learned State counsel submits that impugned order dated 29.11.2022 (Annexure P-4) is confined only to the land comprised in Khasra Nos.102//26 (30-0) and 118//26 (14-19), and not in respect of the land comprised in Khewat No.276/273 as per Jamabandi for the year 2016-17. He further submits that in case, any proceedings are to be initiated in respect of the land comprised in Khasra No.276/273 then the same shall be done separately, in accordance with law, and no action shall be taken against the said land on the basis of order dated 29.11.2022 (Annexure P-4). 4.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that keeping in view the aforesaid stand taken by learned State counsel, he may be permitted to withdraw the instant writ petition.

5.

Ordered accordingly.

6.

All the pending application(s), if any, shall also stand closed. 

   
 
 

           APURVA 2025.05.02 09:14 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document/judgment High Court, Chandigarh