Ram Singh v. State Of Haryana And Others

CWP No.22195 OF 2018 --1--

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH CWP No.22195 OF 2018 DECIDED ON: SEPTEMBER 04, 2018 RAM SINGH ....PETITIONER..

VS.

STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS.

....RESPONDENTS..

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASPAL SINGH Present:- Mr. Ram Pal Verma, Advocate, for the petitioner.

***** JASPAL SINGH, J.

By virtue of instant petition, preferred under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India, petitioner has sought issuance of a writ in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents to grant deemed date of appointment to the petitioner as has been given to other appointed candidates in pursuance of the selection list dated 15.10.1989 by Haryana Staff Selection Commission, same selection process and grant the benefit of seniority and notional pay fixation at par with the candidates/employees with all consequential benefits who have joined their services prior to the petitioner and being junior to the petitioner as per the merit list prepared at the time of selection pertaining to the advertisement dated 22.07.1987.

2.

Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that though a representation dated 27.11.2017 (P-7) was moved to the respondents but till date SONIKA 2018.09.06 11:00 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh

CWP No.22195 OF 2018 --2-- neither any response has been received nor any final decision has been taken. He further submits that petitioner feels satisfied in case direction is issued to respondents to decide representation (P-7), in a time bound manner. 3.

Without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, instant petition is disposed of with a direction to respondents to consider the claim put forth by the petitioner in representation (P-7) and to take a conscious decision in the light of judgments already referred to in the representation (P-7), within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order. 4.

However, if petitioner still feels aggrieved by any of the orders passed by the aforesaid authority, he shall be at liberty to have recourse to other remedies available under law including to approach this Court. SEPTEMBER 04, 2018 (JASPAL SINGH) sonika JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned:

Yes Whether reportable:

Yes/No SONIKA 2018.09.06 11:00 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh