Tarsem Singh v. State Of Punjab And ORS
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT
CHANDIGARH CWP No. 2401 of 2017 Date of decision: 09.02.2017 Tarsem Singh
...Petitioner
Versus
State of Punjab and others
...Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JAISHREE THAKUR
Present:
Mr. Muhish Bhardwaj, Advocate, for the petitioner.
**** JAISHREE THAKUR, J. (ORAL) It is contended that the petitioner obtained 45 marks in the recruitment process that was held for the appointment of Intelligence Assistant (in the rank of Constable) pursuant to an advertisement that was issued.
The petitioner herein wants to change his category to Lineal Descendent of Ex-Serviceman (SC) (Mazbi) by placing reliance on a public notice that was issued and contends that the last person in that category has secured only 40 marks. There are enough vacancies in the said category for him to be considered for appointment. The petitioner has already approached the department concerned to allow him to change his category and if he comes into the zone of consideration, he be considered for appointment.
Learned counsel for the petitioner herein is seeking a limited prayer that his representation be decided as expeditiously as possible. I have heard learned counsel for the petitioner and in view of the limited prayer made, without going into the merits of the case, this Satyawan 2017.02.13 13:15 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document High Court Chandigarh
CWP No. 2401 of 2017 -2petition is disposed of with a direction to the petitioner to file a fresh representation within a period of two weeks along with the certified copy of this order. On receipt of the said representation, respondents No. 2 & 3 are directed to decide the same by passing a speaking order in accordance with law within a period of six weeks thereafter.
09.02.2017 (JAISHREE THAKUR) Satyawan JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes.
Whether reportable No.
Satyawan 2017.02.13 13:15 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document High Court Chandigarh