Sushma v. State Of Haryana

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH **** CWP-17465-2026 Date of Decision: 27.05.2026 SUSHMA

...Petitioner

Vs.

STATE OF HARYANA AND ANR.

...Respondents

CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGMOHAN BANSAL Present:- Mr. Rajesh Goyal, Advocate for the petitioner Ms. Svaneel Jaswal, Addl. A.G. Haryana *** JAGMOHAN BANSAL, J. (ORAL) 1.

The petitioner through instant petition under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India is seeking setting aside of communication whereby his claim for compensation under Deen Dayal Upadhyaya Antyodaya Parivar Suraksha Yojna (for short 'Deen Dayal Yojna') has been rejected on the ground of delay. 2.

As per petition, the petitioner's husband passed away on 19.06.2023. His annual family income as per Parivar Pehchan Patra was less than ₹1,80,000/-. The petitioner filed online application on 20.04.2024 seeking compensation under Deen Dayal Yojna. The respondent has rejected his claim on the ground that application was filed beyond 90 days.

3.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that there was delay of 7 months in issuance of death certificate which resulted delay in filing the claim. The instant case is squarely covered by order dated 01.05.2026 passed in CWP-13358-2026.

DEEPAK BISSYAN 2026.05.27 15:49 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment

CWP-17465-2026 -24.

Learned State counsel expressed her inability to controvert applicability of aforesaid judgment to the instant case. 5.

In the wake of statement of both sides, the petition is hereby allowed in terms of order dated 01.05.2026 passed in CWP-13358-2026. 6.

Pending application(s), if any, stands disposed of. (JAGMOHAN BANSAL) JUDGE May 27, 2026 Deepak DPA Whether Speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether Reportable:

Yes/No DEEPAK BISSYAN 2026.05.27 15:49 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment