Saloni Goyal v. State Of Haryana
!"#$# %&'()( * + %# , + ((((
# %- .-$/$ *
! -,
((((( $0 %1%
-$% & -(#0 %3 #4*-(15 "
46# 3 -(#73#+3 #415 "
4! - # %-( Mr. Gautam Kaile, DAG Haryana Mr. Arun Kumar Goyat, Advocate, for the complainant.
!"# 1.
On 23.07.2025, this Court had passed the following order:- 830 # %-3 $!#+1 0 # %/%1-*"
# % 9: !((*(*6# 3 0- ,- ;- #"#0
-,< #+ 3-#% "
$ ('41
19())(94/%1-*"
# %$9= %19 ! 4-;#$ -1
+#"*
# %#5#+>#%$#%14#$ -#"
#%1(%%?/- > -%1 $%# - " /%$+ -#%; % <3 +! ! # %- $/<@# $
3 ++;
# %$ +5++1 <, " @0+ #% 3 0-$% "
$ - 3#;3+, #@0- < <+ %1 /%<+#5 <+(5%4 3 ++;
# %$0-
#%1 3, - %/ -, 9463- $4 3 6 $;
-;#$ -1<, % 9())(9(!/- 3-" % %1$
1#%!
"
" %%#516# 33#$-+
#5
A#%1- + +463 3 +- 1,;
-;#$ -1 % ('=41
1:(:(94/%1-*"
# %$ 9=494= ! 4 +#"*
# %#5#+>#%$#%14#$ -#"
#%1 ;
#%$ 3 0-$% 0 # %-( !/- 3- " % %1$
# %- #$ , /%; + 1, %1 1$-5$ $,@0
#"
" %$#1-
# %<, 3#$ /- B# 3 / 1@#
#%;3-;/#+ 4+ -%1$%# -" /%$+! - # %- 3 $ 5 +/%
-#+, !!-1 10 $# $/@ !
$(44C #% 3 "" /% ! " @0+ .#% 1 D/@ -4 < -#%; ('994 %74 * 1 ==94 +1% A %1#4#%1( % 3 3-3 %1+ -%1*
" /%$+3 $53@% +, 00 $1 3 $/<@#$$# %$ @ 1 <, + -%1 " /%$+ ! - # %- % 3;- /%1
# %-3 1% %+,"3
#% "
$4</ % 3- $ +$ <%-;#$ -1 ;
#%$ 3-(3/$4 # %-1 $% 1$-5
3" %"$$# % !< #+<, 3#$ /- 3#$$
;46# 3 / " @@% #%; %, 3#%; % 3@-# $ ! 3"
$4 # %-#$1#-"
A #% 3#%5$ #;
# %(%
35% ! --$ 4$3$3 ++<-+ $1 %#% -#@< #+ $
#$!
"
# % ! --$ #%;C%5$ #;
#%; !!#"- $/<A"
" %1# # %$0- 5#11/%1-*"
# %9: !((*(*( 30 # %-$3 ++10 $# $/@ ! $(44C#%
"" /% ! " @0+ .#% 1 D/@ -4 < -#%; ( '994 %74 * 1 ==94 +1 % A %1#4 #%14 !- @ 63- 3 @ /% 6 $ ++;1+, 6# 316%4#% 3! ++ 6#%;@ %%-& # *3$3 ++10 $# $/@ ! $()44C %:((( ## *3$3 ++!/- 3-10 $# $/@ ! $()44C % :(:( %1 3-@ #%#%; @ /% %):(:(( 1A /-%1 =(:((E 2.
> -%1*%# - /%$+$/<@# $
#%" @0+# %" ! -1-
1((43 %1$ 5- 30 $ 1
1"3F/$ + -%1" /%$+ 00 $# %1$
$
# %- 3 1A #%1#%5$ #;
# % 6#" 5-4
63#"3#$ !!#-@1<,+ -%1" /%$+! - (!/- 3-$/<@# $
#%"
$ 3#%5$ #;
#%; ;%",-F/#-$ # %- -4$3 $3 ++@ 73-$+! #+ <+6# 3 / 1@/-( 3.
Learned State counsel on instructions affirms the factum of joining the investigation by the petitioner and cooperating with the investigating agency. He also submits that at this stage, the petitioner is not required for further custodial interrogation. 4.
In view of the above and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, anticipatory bail petition filed by the petitioner is allowed and the order dated 23.07.2025 granting interim bail to her, is hereby made absolute, subject to compliance of conditions as specified under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. (now 482(2) of BNSS, 2023) ( #$@ 1"+ -
$ 30 $ 1
1"3F/$ -% 3 % /-14
3#$0 # %$3 ++<1@1 5<%1#$@#$$1 6# 3 / %,-!-%"
3 /- =( 65-4# #$@ 1"+ -
#! # %-!
#+$ A #% %1 " 0-
6# 3 3#%5$ #;
#%; ;%", $ %163%-F/#-14 3*
6 /+1<
+#<- , @ 5 % 00+#"
# %! -"
%"++
# % !
#"#0
-,< #+;- 3-(
$
%&%'(%!
) 1#%$3 B3 3-$0 7#%;
& $C B3 3--0 -
<+ & $C