Santosh v. Virender

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH FAO-632 of 2011 Date of Decision: 04.08.2022 Santosh ...Appellant

Versus

Virender ....Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE RITU BAHRI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR VERMA Present:- Mr. Sandeep Sharma, Advocate, for the appellant. RITU BAHRI, J. (ORAL) The appellant has filed the present appeal against order dated 18.08.2010 passed by the Civil Judge (Senior Division) Rohtak, execising the powers of District Judge under the Guardian and Wards Act, whereby petition filed by her under Sections 25 and 7 of the Guardians and Wards Act, 1893 for custody of minor son Sorain, has been dismissed. Learned counsel for the appellant submits that since minor Sorain has attained majority on 24.5.2021, the present appeal has become infructuous.

Disposed of as having become infructuous.

(Ritu Bahri) Judge (Ashok Kumar Verma) August 04, 2022 Judge R.S.

Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No RAVINDER SINGH 2022.08.05 14:11 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment